The submission deadline is 17th April 2023 (23:59 CET). Abstracts submitted after the deadline will not be considered. Abstract submissions should be made through the ConfTool system. Please see key dates related to the submission, review, registration and programming process here.
Abstracts not complying with the Abstract Submission Guidelines provided on this page will bounce back before entering the review process and authors will be asked to resubmit.
Abstracts can be submitted in two categories:
For an Abstract to enter the review process and be considered for presentation during the conference the following guidelines must be adhered to:
Scientific Abstracts should be structured using the following sections *:
* The structure should only be altered if clearly justified by the nature of the submission and contribution (e.g. conceptual work).
** In case that the results/findings for a Scientific Abstract are not yet available at the time of Abstract submission, authors have to mention this by guaranteeing that they have the results by the time of the conference. They should provide a preview of the nature of the results/findings as well as envisioned contribution/implications.
For Professional Practice Abstracts the following sections are recommended ***:
***In addition, such a structure might better work for scholarly contributions towards the Parallel Sessions ‘Sport Management Education’ and ‘Sport Law and Ethics’ if they are not concerned with scientific/empirical research. For example, sport management education contributions might be concerned with innovative approaches to curriculum development, learning environments and (higher) education management/policy (yet, please keep in mind that your Abstract should not be a sales pitch for a certain programme, but rather a discussion of ‘best practices’ and sharing learnings that other members of the EASM community may find inspiring and useful).
Importantly, please note the following conference policy: